Stupidity of nineteen days months in Bahai Faith

19 days month in Bahai Faith is totally unscientific and absurd.

And then to make a year of 365 days they have made a stupid adjustment of 4 days- also called as inter-calary days. Why this adjustment is done?

If at all Bahai faith is a religion of God, then why they have deviated from 12 months calendar when all other divine religions have 12 months year. The debate is open for discussion. The only apparent reason for converting the number of month to 19 is due to the signifance of number 19 in Bahai faith( as the number of early converts were 19).

Ayyam-i-Ha or Ayyam-i-Dal ??!!-Stupidity of 19 days months
The Baha’i calendar has 19 months of 19 days each, totalling 361 days in a year + the inter-calary days (Ayyam-i-Ha). Only a leap year has 366 days.

Obviously Husayn ‘Ali Nuri (Baha) could not count properly because any solar inter-calary calculation would make those days Ayyam-i-Dal (i.e. the days to the calulation of the letter dal, ‘d’, letter dal = 4) not Ha (letter ha = 5). Ayyam-i-Ha would technically only occur for the leap years not the normal years. So much for the ‘supreme manifestation of the day’ who could not even count properly!

Thus the so-called Ayyam-i-Ha of Baha’i faith comes only once in 5 years. Rest 4 years have Ayyam-i-Dal. OK !

The Final Word about Bahai Faith and Polygamy

 

 

 

(Arabic text)Bahais are allowed to keep two wives
Reference : http://reference.bahai.org/fa/t/b/KA/ka-87.html#pg57

Here is my translation from the Arabic version of Kitab-e-Aqdas.

Sec 57: “Follow the Sunnat [culture], but not the old people, and not the ignorant. God wrote that you should get married, do not you ever think about going over two women [wives]. And if the man is satisfied [with one], it is better for you and her.”

By that there is no more argument has left that polygamy is legal in Baha’i Faith up to two wives. My only question is how come Bahaullah had 3 wives.

Authored by Ataturk. Reference: http://bhgoat.blog.com/

Are Baha’is Worshiping God or The Son of God?

I was reading Baha’i prayers last night; surprisingly majority of the prayers are addressing Abdul Baha, not even Bahaullah or God. Even the prayers that has put together during Abdul Baha’s time, directly address him as a rescuer and savior. I did a little of research to see why Baha’is who claim they have the most modern religion still stock with the name and the individual. And the following are my discovery.

Baha’is in contrast with traditional religions do not believe in a path to God. The only pass is the happiness of Abdul Baha and his successors.

Although Baha’is believe in:

“There is none other God but Thee, the Inaccessible, the Omnipotent, the Omniscient, the Holy of Holies.”( Baháulláh Gleanings)

Read more of this post

Bahai Faith is BANNED in Most Countries

“IT APPEARS THAT AS HARD AS THE BAHA’IS MIGHT HAVE TRIED OVER THE YEARS TO DISMISS WHAT THEY LABEL “CONSPIRACY THEORIES” REGARDING THEIR CONNECTIONS TO THE BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT, MORE AND MORE SUCH THEORIES CONTINUE TO PERSIST- WHILE WITH EACH DAY MORE EVIDENCE EMERGES PROVING THESE THEORIES AS FACT RATHER THAN THEORY”.

Read more of this post

The General claims of Baha’i Faith

The conception on which Bahaism bases its claim is false. Truth does not grow old, nor is it possible to change the religion with the growth of the race. A universal religion must present truth in a form that will reach men in every stage of civilization, for the reason that in every period of the world since the dawn of history there have been simultaneously men in every stage of intellectual development.—W. A. Shedd in “Miss. Review of the World.”

It (Bahaism) has not enough assurance of personal immortality to satisfy such Western minds as are repelled by the barren and jejune ethical systems of agnostics, positivists, and humanitarians who would give us rules to regulate a life which they have rendered meaningless.—Professor Browne in Phelps’ “Life of Abbas Effendi,” p. xviii.

The essence of being a Bahai is a boundless devotion to the person of the Manifestation and a profound belief that he is divine and of a different order from all other beings.—Professor Browne, Art. “Bab” in Ency. of Religion and Ethics.

The claims of Bahaism are many and varied. They cover a wide range. I will first consider its general claims and of these the most significant.

Read more of this post

Baha’i Faith and Al-Qaida – Thought-provoking article by Juan Cole

The Baha’i faith stands for universal love, for tolerance, and for a separation of religion and state. The need for religious leaders to let politicians do the ruling is a key value stated over and over again in Baha’i scripture.

Unfortunately, a weird Baha’i sub-cult has arisen. It structurally resembles al-Qaida, and differs from al-Qaida only with regard to methods, not ideals. It does not usually employ violence or terrorism (though persons with this mindset have beaten up friends of mind).

And, most frighteningly of all, it has taken over and subverted the main institutions of the Baha’i faith.

1) Al-Qaida believes in the destruction of secular, civil governments and replacing them with a fascist theocracy.

Baha’i theocrats believe in the destruction of secular, civil governments and replacing them with a fascist theocracy. Ian Semple, a member of the Baha’i Universal House of Justice, has for decades cast scorn on civil governments and spoken of his dream of a future when Baha’i Institutions will rule in their stead.

One pilgrim wrote,

“I recall being in Haifa in the ’70s (’72 and ’78) and hearing long talks about this from Ian Semple, on how the world was destined to be ruled by houses of justice and there will eventually be no distinction between church and state, with rather snide and smug comments about how at last the world will finally get it right and have God and Government fused through the power of the Baha’i covenant.”

Note that this is the opposite of what `Abdu’l-Baha says in the Treatise on Leadership:

http://www2.h-net.msu.edu/~bahai/trans/vol2/absiyasi.htm

Ian Semple also put out a letter from the Secretariat of the UHJ:

“As for the statement made by Shoghi Effendi in his letter of 21 March 1932, the well-established principles of the Faith concerning the relationship of the Baha’i institutions to those of the country in which the Baha’is reside make it unthinkable that they would ever purpose to violate a country’s constitution or so to meddle in its political machinery as to attempt to take over the powers of government. This is an integral element of the Baha’i principle of abstention from involvement in politics. However, this does not by any means imply that the country itself may not, by constitutional means, decide to adopt Baha’i laws and practices and modify its constitution or method of government accordingly.”

In this passage he basically argues for a Nazi-like tactic of getting elected democratically and then abolishing democracy. By the way, the Islamists (with al-Qaida links) tried this in Algeria, and the democrats and secularists fought back, embroiling the country in a civil war that has cost 100,000 lives. This is the sort of conflict between theocratic Baha’is and the rest of society that Semple is urging on the world. At that point would the Baha’i theocrats refrain from violence?

2) Al-Qaida wishes to reestablish the Islamic Caliphate as the One World Government.

Baha’i theocrats substitute the House of Justice for the Caliphate and envision it ruling the world.

3) Al-Qaida despises parliamentary democracy as corrupt, money-driven and unrepresentative. It wishes to overthrow parliaments and institute authoritarian religious rule instead.

Baha’i theocrats despise parliamentary democracy and wish to substitute their religious institutions, which are not freely elected, for civil government. Long-time Baha’i leader Firuz Kazemzadeh said in 1988:

“If somebody is dissatisfied with a local assembly, he is not prevented from appealing to the NSA . . . It is something else when whispering campaigns or petitions are sent around for signatures objecting to the activities of the institutions. That also may be something which is countenanced by American democracy but has nothing to do with the Bahaullah and Baha’i Faith. We must always remember that our institutions are an unusual and unique combination of theocracy in the best sense of the term with democracy. The institutions of the Baha’i Faith have not been created by us, the institutions have been created by God.

Actually, Kazemzadeh’s version of the Baha’i institutions has been created by Kazemzadeh.

4) Al-Qaida establishes cells throughout the world to work for theocracy, and recruits innocent Muslims at mosques.

Baha’i theocrats have secret cells within the Baha’i community, and recruit Baha’is at deepenings and other events into their twisted world-view. Many “Auxiliary Board Members” and Assistants are secret theocrats who play dirty tricks on ordinary Baha’is to force them out of the Faith.

The Ian Semple / Kazemzadeh theocratic ideology aims at destroying American democracy. It aims at gutting the Constitution and abolishing Congress in favor of Kazemzadeh’s weird, secretive, authoritarian way of ruling.

5) Al-Qaida demands absolute obedience from its recruits, and no dissent is permitted.

Baha’i theocrats demand absolute obedience to “the Institutions” and tolerate no dissent. Kazemzadeh told a group of Baha’i intellectuals, “the word dissent implies separating oneself from the activities of the group and putting oneself outside the mainstream of the community, and that is contrary to Baha’i practice.

You can’t disagree with the NSA.

The dangers to the pristine Baha’i faith, with its values of tolerance, allowing the expression of diverse points of view, and firm commitment to the separation of religion and state, of this theocratic cult that has taken control of the community cannot be overstated. Moreover, it is a threat to the whole world.

Now that we have seen where such authoritarian theocracy leads, on September 11, I call upon all Baha’is to step back, reread the scriptures, and adhere to the real values of our religion.

Juan Cole

Universal Auxiliary Language – What nonsense!

The Bahai Faith has introduced the idea of having an auxiliary language. This is an important Bahai principle which claims to be a step towards bringing world peace, as Abdul Baha has been quoted to have said: “One of the great steps towards universal peace would be the establishment of a universal language.”
(Paris Talks, The Eighth Principle)

Considering the fact that it is included amongst the important 12 Bahai principles, it would be worthwhile to know its conformity with divine laws.

Read more of this post

Infallibility of UHJ demands NO ELECTIONS!

by Robert Well

The Baha’is believe that their administration is divine and the House of Justice is infalliable. The Baha’is should submit themselves to the Universal House of Justice in Haifa, Israel (UHJ) and let them decide what is good for them, as the Supreme Body is considered ‘infallible’.

 This means that only the First Election of UHJ in 1963 was required as it was for the first time that the infallible body was formed. After that all the subsequent elections and bye elections were absolutely unwanted for because the UHJ is itself Infallible. The retiring member should have put this agenda in front of the UHJ that due to his advanced age he wants to retire and let UHJ decide a new member in his place. Obviously this decision would have been free of error and the most eligible member’s name would have emerged out.

Read more of this post

Open Questions to Tavakoli and UHJ

Interesting article that I found on ~http://bahaisects.wordpress.com/. Do go through it. It highlights the dissension within the worldwide Bahai community…

——-

The purpose of the conference in Toronto which was held under  chairmanship of Mr. Tavakoli and under the Guidance of Universal House  of Justice failed to achieve any of its aim because the conference  failed to reflect on very important issues prevailing in the Baha’i  organization. For example, The Baha’i NSA of the US recently lost a  case in which it attempted to sue rival, schismatic Baha’i groups for trademark infringement of the name Baha’i. The daily increase in the numerous harassment that Baha’is have been subjected to. The existence  of a Baha’i Internet Agency one of whose roles is to spy and isolate  online critics. Trying to find out their IP addresses then their home addresses and then bullying them to submission. Forcing Google to  disband their blogs/sites.

After all, thinking is our freedom to investigate the truth and follow  it. If one is truly liberal then his approaches will not suffocate the  human mind to certain ideals only. The conference failed to encourage  the audience to seek out the truth in their investigation. It failed  in encouraging audience to apply truth to their investigation. Mr. Tavakoli and his Haifan Baha’i friends should note that staying in glass houses one should not through stones at others. In future never use Academic Institute like Toronto University as your implementing agenda forum.

Can Mr. Tavakoli and his Haifan organization answer?

The Haifan Baha’is always preaches tolerance and peace then why do they not extend the same tolerance and peace to their own while demanding it from other religious leaders? is this not hypocrisy?

Why excommunicate Academician and University professor like Prof Firouz Anarki the former member of NSA of Thailand just because he believed that to become a good teacher for Children classes one need not do Ruhi book 3.

Why excommunicate Mr. Jamshed Fozdar who so sincerely worked for Haifan Baha’is as a counselor for a number of years. His only fault was his assertions that the content of the books of the Ruhi Institute are unjustified, and that the only valid way to teach the Cause to the peoples of the world is through the use of the scriptures of their respective religions

Why send Counselors to threaten professors of history and Middle East studies of ‘making statements contrary to the covenant’ in the Spring of 1996 and bully them out of the religion?

Why the crackdown on the talis…@indiana.edu list and its participants? Why bully individuals to retract statements of fact, but when they do under duress, they are Sanctioned?

Why bully the editors of dialogue magazine to close it down and accuse them of negative campaigning and lying for an article entitled *A Modest Proposal* which had gone through the process of pre-publication review by the NSA itself and then accuse these editors of being covenant breakers for following the NSA’s own rules and guidelines on the floor of National Convention in 1988?

Why threaten people believing in freedom of conscience and freedom to express one’s opinion?

Why expel Michael McKenney for merely believing that women should serve on the UHJ?

Why expel Alison Marshall for believing that the UHJ is not infallible?

Why sanction those Iranian Baha’is for leaving Iran via Mehrabad airport because they were required to fill out a form stating their religion?

Why spy on individuals and violate their fundamental right to privacy a year after they had formally left the religion?

Why write libelous and slanderous letters about people and then denounce them as enemies in their national publications?

Why attempt to have people shunned and split up their families because they believe differently from the official line? And so on and so forth, ad nauseum!

Given the current UHJ’s own track record with its own dissidents, it is the last one who can preach about peace and tolerance towards others! They ought to start with themselves first before telling others what to do?

Human Rights and the Bahai Faith

Hi Friends,

I saw this post on Google Groups and found it an interesting thought and hence I decided to share it with everyone..

—–

Been thinking about why freedom of association is so important that it is included in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Have also been thinking about how Baha’i religious practice contravenes this right and how a religion which has progressive aspects has evolved to not recognize this basic human right.

The illogic of the Baha’i religious practice of shunning those it has labeled as covenant breakers is that a Baha’i could be forced to associate with a fellow Baha’i whose character is shady while at the same time being forced to not associate with a Baha’i from a different sect whose character is laudable. Not only is this illogical, in Canadian law it is illegal because it contravenes our Character of Rights and Freedoms right of association.

Which makes more sense? The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms or Baha’i religious practice, Baha’i religious law? A Baha’i religious law which can even force family members to not associate with each other on threat of being excommunicated from the Baha’i religion?

There are aspects of Baha’i belief that need to be shed before the Baha’i religion can truly be a humanitarian religion, a religion which truly honors the human rights of all, a religion fit for this time in humanities history.

Source:

—–

If you want to read more about this, then you can browse through the following articles:

Class System in Bahai Faith

Human Equality in the Bahai Faith